IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Stirling Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-12-26 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 46 4 10 14 0.304 0.1172 0.1181 0.4428 0.4463
2016-17 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 49 4 27 31 0.633 0.2438 0.2332 0.9208 0.8809
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 5 0 6 6 1.200
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 23 4 5 9 0.391
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 22 1 7 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Connecticut College
+105.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7777
Defenseman overall
#1288
Defenseman born in 1996
#1700
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Fleming
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nicholas Bondra
Amherst · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Jobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2008-09
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jory McWilliams
Bethel · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.