← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Orr Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 48 5 11 16 0.333 0.1321 0.1420
2019-20 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 52 5 10 15 0.288 0.1075 0.1075 0.4204 0.4204
2020-21 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 42 2 10 12 0.286 0.1132 0.1132 0.3000 0.3000
2021-22 NAHL 59 9 34 43 0.729 0.2888 0.2679 0.7652 0.7097
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 AHA SR 35 5 13 18 0.514
2024-25 Stonehill D1 AHA 34 8 7 15 0.441
2023-24 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA 14 1 1 2 0.143
2022-23 Michigan Tech D1 CCHA 28 2 4 6 0.214
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Michigan Tech
+4.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7173
Defenseman overall
#1545
Defenseman born in 2001
#2650
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2016-17
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2012-13
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.