IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Geno McEnery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-10-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Kent School NE-Prep 26 13 25 38 1.462 0.4123 0.4123 0.6688 0.6688
2022-23 Janesville Jets NAHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.2641 0.2687 0.7000 0.7121
2023-24 — NAHL 58 7 26 33 0.569 0.2254 0.2185 0.5974 0.5792
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 1 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Providence D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15443
Forward overall
#761
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grant Newcomer
Concordia · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Wood
Endicott · 2014-15
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyler Matthews
Canton · 2017-18
0.941 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.