IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bergstrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Buffalo USHS-MN 19 4 4 8 0.421 0.1134 0.1134 0.1023 0.1023
2021-22 Buffalo USHS-MN 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.0932 0.0932 0.0841 0.0841
2022-23 Buffalo USHS-MN 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.1938 0.1938 0.1749 0.1749
2023-24 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 44 24 35 59 1.341 0.3084 0.3086 0.4248 0.4250
2024-25 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 46 26 41 67 1.456 0.3350 0.3178 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC — 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16229
Forward overall
#802
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Bayda
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Egan
Babson · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.