IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Bergstrom Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Buffalo USHS-MN 19 4 4 8 0.421 0.0533 0.0533 0.1023 0.1023
2021-22 Buffalo USHS-MN 26 4 5 9 0.346 0.0438 0.0438 0.0841 0.0841
2022-23 Buffalo USHS-MN 25 8 10 18 0.720 0.0912 0.0912 0.1749 0.1749
2023-24 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 44 24 35 59 1.341 0.1683 0.1684 0.4233 0.4235
2024-25 Louisiana Drillers NA3HL 46 26 41 67 1.456 0.1828 0.1734 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16636
Forward overall
#812
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Colby Nichol
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.850 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Polsinelli
Trinity · 2015-16
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Fritz
Saint John's · 2013-14
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.