← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aiden Farro Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-07 Country: USA
Johnson & Wales
CNE D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 17 0 2 2 0.118 0.0432 0.0469 0.1243 0.1350
2023-24 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 50 2 10 12 0.240 0.0882 0.0916 0.2537 0.2634
2024-25 — NAHL 38 1 8 9 0.237 0.0870 0.0858 0.2503 0.2468
2025-26 Maine Nordiques NAHL 54 3 8 11 0.204 0.0748 0.0701 0.2153 0.2017
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19126
Defenseman overall
#3354
Defenseman born in 2005
#5730
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Johnson & Wales Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.20
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales
0.00
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales
0.00
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales
0.21
actual FR PPG at Johnson & Wales

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Western New England · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2023-24
0.633 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.