IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Golisano Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 New York Apple Core EHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0367 0.0390 0.1056 0.1123
2023-24 New York Apple Core EHL 27 17 19 36 1.333 0.3080 0.3176 0.6524 0.6726
2024-25 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 49 8 9 17 0.347 0.1275 0.1228 0.3662 0.3528
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Plymouth State
-27.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25346
Forward overall
#1430
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan McIntyre
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2005-06
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Kangas
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristan Boyer
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.