← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Smith Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-20 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 47 19 18 37 0.787 0.2365 0.2639
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 34 5 4 9 0.265 0.1627 0.1627 0.7799 0.7799
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 11 3 1 4 0.364 0.2235 0.2235 1.0712 1.0712
2021-22 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 11 14 25 0.472 0.1757 0.1711 0.6873 0.6693
2022-23 Penticton Vees BCHL 53 10 12 22 0.415 0.1546 0.1430 0.6048 0.5594
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst D1 AHA GR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2024-25 Mercyhurst D1 AHA SR 32 1 3 4 0.125
2023-24 Mercyhurst D1 AHA JR 34 3 5 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2023-24 · Mercyhurst
+78.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31890
Forward overall
#1887
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.