IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Starzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0735 0.0728 0.2111 0.2091
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0490 0.0463 0.1407 0.1331
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 27 6 7 13 0.481
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2020-21 Stevenson D1 MAC SO 16 5 4 9 0.562
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 16 5 4 9 0.562
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17620
Forward overall
#837
Forward born in 1998
#1005
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Ford
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vincent Anderson
New England College · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jay Paul
Bethel · 2015-16
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.