IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anthony Starzi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 5 1 0 1 0.200 0.0743 0.0736 0.2118 0.2098
2018-19 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0495 0.0468 0.1411 0.1335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Stevenson D3 MAC SR 27 6 7 13 0.481
2021-22 Stevenson D3 MAC JR 26 2 7 9 0.346
2020-21 Stevenson D3 MAC SO 16 5 4 9 0.562
2019-20 Stevenson D3 MAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
45%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22615
Forward overall
#905
Forward born in 1998
#2337
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Dau
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Air Force (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Ford
UMass Boston · 2022-23
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Gingera
Castleton · 2011-12
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave Williams
St. Scholastica · 2008-09
0.259 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.