IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jay Paul Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 43 11 14 25 0.581 0.0730 0.0716 0.1835 0.1801
2015-16 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 43 10 24 34 0.791 0.0992 0.0925 0.2496 0.2328
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bethel D1 MIAC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Bethel D1 MIAC JR 23 2 7 9 0.391
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 23 2 7 9 0.391
2017-18 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 16 1 1 2 0.125
2016-17 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 24 3 1 4 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · Bethel
+131.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34712
Forward overall
#1417
Forward born in 1995
#1480
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Gatto
SUNY Oswego · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick DiNicola
Fitchburg State · 2014-15
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bruneteau
Hamilton · 2013-14
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.