IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick DiNicola Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-06-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 60 7 7 14 0.233 0.0655 0.0628 0.1918 0.1838
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC SR 26 13 29 42 1.615
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SR 26 13 29 42 1.615
2017-18 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC JR 27 11 36 47 1.741
2016-17 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC SO 27 6 15 21 0.778
2015-16 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC FR 24 7 17 24 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2015-16 · Fitchburg State
+1758.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#54380
Forward overall
#2310
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

T.J. Haas
Arcadia · 2023-24
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sam Miller
Chatham · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daylan Marchi
Marian · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.