IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

T.J. Haas Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 36 8 21 29 0.806 0.1057 0.1057 0.2735 0.2735
2021-22 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 39 15 14 29 0.744 0.0976 0.1012 0.2525 0.2617
2022-23 Chicago Cougars USPHL-Premier 41 21 29 50 1.220 0.1600 0.1580 0.4140 0.4088
2023-24 — USPHL-Premier 39 19 24 43 1.103 0.1447 0.1359 0.3743 0.3515
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D2 NE10 — 8 1 0 1 0.125
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC — 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2024-25 · Arcadia
+34.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12423
Forward overall
#583
Forward born in 2003
#611
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vincenzo Renda
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Luca Rea
Plymouth State · 2023-24
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Jackson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.