IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Feinberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Kent School NE-Prep 26 3 5 8 0.308 0.0610 0.0610 0.1402 0.1402
2020-21 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 24 2 9 11 0.458 0.0580 0.0580 0.1113 0.1113
2021-22 Eden Prairie USHS-MN 26 9 10 19 0.731 0.0925 0.0925 0.1775 0.1775
2022-23 Northeast Generals NAHL 16 0 1 1 0.062 0.0230 0.0229 0.0660 0.0659
2023-24 Northeast Generals NAHL 8 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Suffolk D3 CNE — 21 1 3 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2024-25 · Suffolk
+338.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
52%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15958
Forward overall
#789
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Rowland
UMass Boston · 2017-18
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kieran Furlonger
Fredonia · 2018-19
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Maciag
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.