← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Rowland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-06-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 39 3 17 20 0.513 0.0751 0.0829 0.2512 0.2774
2016-17 Philadelphia Revolution EHL 48 4 22 26 0.542 0.0793 0.0840 0.2653 0.2809
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 56 2 10 12 0.214 0.0761 0.0753 0.2260 0.2237
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 8 24 32 0.561 0.1995 0.1885 0.5922 0.5596
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SR 25 1 2 3 0.120
2021-22 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2019-20 UMass Boston D1 NEHC FR 26 0 8 8 0.308
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 26 0 8 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2019-20 · UMass Boston
+127.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8818
Defenseman overall
#1643
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2001-02
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2007-08
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.