| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Philadelphia Revolution | EHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2015-16 | Philadelphia Revolution | EHL | 39 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 0.513 | 0.0751 | 0.0829 | 0.2512 | 0.2774 |
| 2016-17 | Philadelphia Revolution | EHL | 48 | 4 | 22 | 26 | 0.542 | 0.0793 | 0.0840 | 0.2653 | 0.2809 |
| 2017-18 | Northeast Generals | NAHL | 56 | 2 | 10 | 12 | 0.214 | 0.0761 | 0.0753 | 0.2260 | 0.2237 |
| 2018-19 | Northeast Generals | NAHL | 57 | 8 | 24 | 32 | 0.561 | 0.1995 | 0.1885 | 0.5922 | 0.5596 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | UMass Boston | D3 | NEHC | SR | 25 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0.120 |
| 2021-22 | UMass Boston | D3 | NEHC | JR | 23 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.217 |
| 2019-20 | UMass Boston | D1 | NEHC | FR | 26 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.308 |
| 2019-20 | UMass Boston | D3 | NEHC | FR | 26 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 0.308 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.