IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Maciag Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 37 2 8 10 0.270 0.0663 0.0670 0.1850 0.1869
2011-12 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 51 4 23 27 0.529 0.1148 0.1104 0.4098 0.3940
2012-13 Coquitlam Express BCHL 33 3 3 6 0.182 0.0700 0.0647 0.2649 0.2449
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SO 24 1 1 2 0.083
2013-14 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 8 1 0 1 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2013-14 · UMass Boston
+59.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14689
Defenseman overall
#1621
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Spencer Sasenbury
Canton · 2024-25
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Pickering
Canton · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Trace Strahle
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.