← New Search ↗ Social Card

Owen Michaels Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-01 Country: USA
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lincoln Stars USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 46 6 10 16 0.348 0.2138 0.2138 1.0248 1.0248
2020-21 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 44 3 18 21 0.477 0.1891 0.1891 0.5011 0.5011
2021-22 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 47 11 21 32 0.681 0.2698 0.2679 0.7148 0.7096
2022-23 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 46 15 11 26 0.565 0.3474 0.3127 1.6652 1.4988
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 39 13 13 26 0.667
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SO 42 18 18 36 0.857
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC FR 38 2 5 7 0.184
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2023-24 · Western Michigan
-27.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2021-22
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.