← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Ierfino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 24 3 6 9 0.375 0.0723 0.0723 0.1716 0.1716
2020-21 Brockville Braves CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Portsmouth Abbey NE-Prep 25 24 19 43 1.720 0.3318 0.3318 0.7871 0.7871
2022-23 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 14 0 4 4 0.286 0.0620 0.0597 0.2212 0.2131
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2024-25 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 19 4 1 5 0.263
2023-24 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2023-24 · Hamilton
-50.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
48%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25172
Forward overall
#1400
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2017-18
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.