IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braydon Buckingham Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Prior Lake USHS-MN 19 1 2 3 0.158 0.0195 0.0195 0.0384 0.0384
2021-22 Boston Advantage USPHL-Premier 41 10 8 18 0.439 0.0495 0.0508 0.1493 0.1531
2022-23 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 6 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 — NA3HL 42 11 25 36 0.857 0.0948 0.0878 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 King's D3 MAC — 25 4 5 9 0.360
2024-25 King's D3 MAC — 18 2 0 2 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2024-25 · King's
+69.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32661
Forward overall
#1966
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Woodruff
Stonehill · 2015-16
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Dan Miller
Hobart · 2005-06
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Rashotte
Lake Forest · 2003-04
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.