← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Fortune Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-09-11 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Holy Cross
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 52 8 15 23 0.442 0.1625 0.1810 0.4668 0.5201
2024-25 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 33 9 18 27 0.818 0.3153 0.3293 1.1907 1.2435
2025-26 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 49 15 37 52 1.061 0.4089 0.4120 1.5444 1.5562
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14587
Forward overall
#576
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Holy Cross Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2016-17
0.85
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
BCHL 2012-13
0.31
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
NE-Prep 2019-20
0.33
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross
USHL 2021-22
0.21
actual FR PPG at Holy Cross

D2/3 Comparables

University of New England · 2018-19
1.667 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.923 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2021-22
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.