← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Scarth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-08-28 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Calgary Royals AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2010-11 AJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0671 0.0732 0.1851 0.2018
2011-12 Powell River Kings BCHL 57 20 18 38 0.667 0.2569 0.2659 0.9702 1.0041
2012-13 Powell River Kings BCHL 30 14 14 28 0.933 0.3596 0.3552 1.3582 1.3415
2013-14 Powell River Kings BCHL 14 9 7 16 1.143 0.4404 0.4147 1.6633 1.5661
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 3 1 0 1 0.333
2014-15 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 26 4 4 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2014-15 · Holy Cross
-8.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11453
Forward overall
#424
Forward born in 1993

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.27 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Yale
0.48 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Norwich · 2016-17
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2015-16
1.296 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.