← New Search ↗ Social Card

George Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-02-15 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Colorado Grit NAHL 55 7 13 20 0.364 0.1336 0.1384 0.3843 0.3980
2024-25 Colorado Grit NAHL 57 24 19 43 0.754 0.2772 0.2725 0.7973 0.7839
2025-26 — NAHL 53 19 16 35 0.660 0.2426 0.2266 0.6980 0.6519
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Brown D1 ECAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21749
Forward overall
#1177
Forward born in 2005
#1541
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2023-24
0.09
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
NAHL 2015-16
0.11
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2000-01
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.