← New Search ↗ Social Card

Archer Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-06 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Taft NE-Prep 5 1 1 2 0.400 0.0804 0.0804 0.1829 0.1829
2021-22 Taft NE-Prep 22 4 9 13 0.591 0.1188 0.1188 0.2702 0.2702
2022-23 Taft NE-Prep 27 10 13 23 0.852 0.1713 0.1713 0.3896 0.3896
2023-24 Taft NE-Prep 25 6 12 18 0.720 0.1448 0.1448 0.3293 0.3293
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 42 3 7 10 0.238 0.0875 0.0874 0.2516 0.2512
2025-26 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 26 0 5 5 0.192 0.0707 0.0671 0.2032 0.1929
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2026-27 Brown D1 ECAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
28%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#44720
Forward overall
#2908
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2022-23
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2018-19
0.80
actual FR PPG at Brown
USHL 2023-24
0.07
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2023-24
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.