IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.5576 0.5576 0.8086 0.8086
2021-22 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 46 4 7 11 0.239 0.0891 0.0910 0.3484 0.3557
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 29 3 10 13 0.448 0.1776 0.1764 0.4707 0.4675
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 3 10 13 0.232 0.1427 0.1284 0.6838 0.6154
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC — 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Brown
-43.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38165
Forward overall
#2379
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brendan Dicker
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.542 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gramm McCormack
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Lison
Bowdoin · 2013-14
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.