IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew King Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-04-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 1 1 0 1 1.000 0.4077 0.4077 0.8038 0.8038
2021-22 Cranbrook Bucks BCHL 46 4 7 11 0.239 0.0921 0.0940 0.3480 0.3553
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 29 3 10 13 0.448 0.1647 0.1636 0.4732 0.4700
2023-24 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 56 3 10 13 0.232 0.1369 0.1232 0.6971 0.6274
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC — 20 5 6 11 0.550
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC — 14 0 1 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2024-25 · Brown
-40.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
25%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38195
Forward overall
#2379
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Brenk
Augsburg · 2014-15
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ricky Helmbrecht
Curry · 2005-06
1.333 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor van Weelie
Concordia · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.