← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cullen Emery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-02 Country: USA
Brown
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Dexter NE-Prep 25 7 3 10 0.400 0.0792 0.0792 0.1822 0.1822
2022-23 Dexter NE-Prep 31 5 4 9 0.290 0.0575 0.0575 0.1323 0.1323
2023-24 BCHL 6 2 0 2 0.333 0.1284 0.1334 0.4851 0.5041
2024-25 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 53 18 22 40 0.755 0.2773 0.2790 0.7966 0.8015
2025-26 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 48 13 18 31 0.646 0.3810 0.3482 1.9396 1.7725
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

62%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10726
Forward overall
#480
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Brown Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NE-Prep 2018-19
0.20
actual FR PPG at Brown
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.33
actual FR PPG at Brown
USPHL-Premier-Classic 2016-17
0.12
actual FR PPG at Brown
BCHL 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Brown

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.