IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Wakeford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-06-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Okotoks Oilers AJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 51 7 19 26 0.510 0.1964 0.2129 0.7419 0.8042
2018-19 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 41 8 24 32 0.780 0.3007 0.3097 1.1359 1.1700
2019-20 Salmon Arm Silverbacks BCHL 58 18 32 50 0.862 0.3322 0.3322 1.2546 1.2546
2020-21 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 20 5 9 14 0.700 0.2697 0.2697 1.0187 1.0187
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC JR 23 0 2 2 0.087
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC SO 7 0 1 1 0.143
2021-22 Brown D1 ECAC FR 23 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#17362
Forward overall
#768
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Jarrid Privitera
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Vermont (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Grant Besse
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Steman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Montgomery
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Shuart
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Michigan
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Craig Levey
Hobart · 2000-01
1.038 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Fiume
Neumann · 2001-02
1.040 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Caden Triggs
Concordia · 2019-20
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.