IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dean Bauchiero Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salisbury School NE-Prep 29 4 4 8 0.276 0.0547 0.0547 0.1257 0.1257
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 8 5 13 0.464 0.0920 0.0920 0.2115 0.2115
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0983 0.0928 0.5007 0.4727
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC SR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 18 3 0 3 0.167
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 21 1 0 1 0.048
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
28%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35045
Forward overall
#2107
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Widing
Hamline · 2010-11
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin Crowe
Wentworth · 2009-10
0.793 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Kidney
Salve Regina · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.