IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dean Bauchiero Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-03-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Salisbury School NE-Prep 29 4 4 8 0.276 0.0778 0.0778 0.1263 0.1263
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 8 5 13 0.464 0.1310 0.1310 0.2125 0.2125
2021-22 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.1025 0.0968 0.4911 0.4637
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Brown D1 ECAC SR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2024-25 Brown D1 ECAC JR 18 3 0 3 0.167
2023-24 Brown D1 ECAC SO 21 1 0 1 0.048
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
25%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35287
Forward overall
#2132
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vladislav Sorokin
Wisconsin-Stout · 2017-18
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bud Winter
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2018-19
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kevin O'Donnell
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.