← New Search ↗ Social Card

Easton Ryan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-05-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Kemptville 73's CCHL 54 5 10 15 0.278 0.0603 0.0603 0.2150 0.2150
2020-21 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 48 23 24 47 0.979 0.2263 0.2360 0.7918 0.8259
2022-23 Boston Jr. Bruins NCDC 50 22 35 57 1.140 0.2635 0.2638 0.9218 0.9229
2023-24 Merritt Centennials BCHL 44 13 6 19 0.432 0.1664 0.1548 0.6292 0.5853
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 28 15 8 23 0.821
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC 20 5 4 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2024-25 · Hobart
+165.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8820
Forward overall
#367
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2006-07
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Mary's · 2005-06
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2023-24
0.885 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.