IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kristofers Krumins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-22 Country: Latvia
Neumann
Verbal MAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 5 2 3 5 1.000 0.4077 0.4452 0.8002 0.8738
2023-24 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 46 11 3 14 0.304 0.1118 0.1163 0.3216 0.3346
2024-25 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 6 1 0 1 0.167 0.0612 0.0605 0.1762 0.1741
2025-26 — NAHL 49 11 11 22 0.449 0.1650 0.1549 0.4745 0.4455
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36122
Forward overall
#2206
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Neumann Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Nick Minerva
0.67
actual FR PPG at Neumann
Ryan Luiten
0.69
actual FR PPG at Neumann
J.D. Speer
0.27
actual FR PPG at Neumann
Roey Aharonovich
0.00
actual FR PPG at Neumann

D2/3 Comparables

Brayden Cook
University of New England · 2023-24
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bennett Weycker
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Wyers
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.