← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kyle Bettens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 1 0 3 3 3.000 0.5775 0.6576 1.8918 2.1541
2018-19 Fargo Force USHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 49 18 38 56 1.143 0.2200 0.2200 0.7207 0.7207
2020-21 Omaha Lancers USHL 50 9 20 29 0.580 0.3421 0.3421 1.7420 1.7420
2021-22 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 54 17 18 35 0.648 0.3823 0.3482 1.9465 1.7729
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA SR 31 2 9 11 0.355
2024-25 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 32 1 5 6 0.188
2023-24 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 36 6 12 18 0.500
2022-23 Minnesota Duluth D1 NCHC 33 5 3 8 0.242
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · Minnesota Duluth
-40.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

72%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11170
Forward overall
#511
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.33 PPG
→ UMass (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2014-15
0.773 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.