← New Search ↗ Social Card

Evan Bushy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 USHL 14 1 1 2 0.143 0.0843 0.0843 0.4292 0.4292
2020-21 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 52 2 13 15 0.288 0.1060 0.1060 0.3045 0.3045
2021-22 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 52 6 25 31 0.596 0.2297 0.2220 0.8676 0.8384
2022-23 Trail Smoke Eaters BCHL 54 7 28 35 0.648 0.2497 0.2291 0.9432 0.8653
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 36 3 10 13 0.361
2024-25 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA SR 33 0 14 14 0.424
2023-24 Lake Superior State D1 CCHA JR 37 1 14 15 0.405
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2023-24 · Lake Superior State
+81.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6474
Defenseman overall
#1562
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2010-11
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.