IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Morgan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-11-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Breck USHS-MN 26 10 22 32 1.231 0.1516 0.1516 0.2990 0.2990
2020-21 Breck USHS-MN 19 7 15 22 1.158 0.1427 0.1427 0.2813 0.2813
2021-22 Edina USHS-MN 31 3 14 17 0.548 0.0676 0.0676 0.1332 0.1332
2022-23 Edina USHS-MN 29 6 5 11 0.379 0.0467 0.0467 0.0921 0.0921
2023-24 — NAHL 44 2 5 7 0.159 0.0565 0.0578 0.1670 0.1709
2024-25 — NAHL 53 7 19 26 0.491 0.1743 0.1692 0.5151 0.4999
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Middlebury D3 NESCAC — 19 1 0 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2025-26 · Middlebury
-55.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12654
Defenseman overall
#2576
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Collins
Elmira · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Dawson
Nazareth · 2011-12
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zannella
Buffalo State · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.