IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy LaCroix Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 18 8 8 16 0.889 0.1163 0.1195 0.3017 0.3099
2023-24 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 20 2 3 5 0.250 0.0919 0.0910 0.2639 0.2614
2024-25 — NCDC 45 6 11 17 0.378 0.1540 0.1449 0.3037 0.2858
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Southern New Hampshire D2 NE10 — 14 1 0 1 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2025-26 · Southern New Hampshire
-32.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29556
Forward overall
#1749
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shane Adler
New England College · 2022-23
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Timothy Baylis
Southern New Hampshire · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Inderieden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.