IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marius Angelin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-07-18 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Frölunda HC U20 SHL-J20 14 0 2 2 0.143 0.0789 0.0754 0.1907 0.1822
2023-24 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 16 1 2 3 0.188 0.0743 0.0711 0.1969 0.1883
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 7 9 0.474
2024-25 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 7 9 0.474
2023-24 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 7 9 0.474
2022-23 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 7 9 0.474
2021-22 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 7 9 0.474
2020-21 Niagara ACHA_D1 — — 19 2 7 9 0.474

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13758
Defenseman overall
#2667
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Anderson
Wisconsin-Superior · 2013-14
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Cobb
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Guay
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2004-05
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.