IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joshua Belz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-12-31 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Oklahoma City Ice Hawks NA3HL 10 0 4 4 0.400 0.0502 0.0502 0.1263 0.1263
2022-23 — EHL 35 4 3 7 0.200 0.0462 0.0483 0.0979 0.1023
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 29 1 2 3 0.103 0.0380 0.0372 0.1091 0.1068
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 0 3 3 0.120
2024-25 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 0 3 3 0.120
2023-24 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 0 3 3 0.120
2022-23 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 0 3 3 0.120
2021-22 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 0 3 3 0.120
2020-21 University of Oklahoma ACHA_D1 — — 25 0 3 3 0.120

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#57211
Forward overall
#3974
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carson Schell
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Rush
Hobart · 2009-10
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jared Pilet
Concordia · 2013-14
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.