IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Grant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 26 1 4 5 0.192 0.0371 0.0371 0.0880 0.0880
2022-23 Noble & Greenough NE-Prep 27 7 11 18 0.667 0.1286 0.1286 0.3051 0.3051
2023-24 Rochester Jr. Americans NAHL 29 1 1 2 0.069 0.0245 0.0243 0.0724 0.0717
2024-25 South Shore Kings NCDC 54 7 22 29 0.537 0.1241 0.1167 0.4342 0.4083
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 26 2 3 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2025-26 · Babson
+155.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6832
Defenseman overall
#1677
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Kudynski
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Williams
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Saler
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.