← New Search ↗ Social Card

Isaac Flatley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-10-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Virginia/Mountain Iron-Buhl USHS-MN 20 8 6 14 0.700 0.0886 0.0886 0.1700 0.1700
2021-22 Rock Ridge USHS-MN 26 9 11 20 0.769 0.0974 0.0974 0.1868 0.1868
2022-23 Rock Ridge USHS-MN 28 13 22 35 1.250 0.1583 0.1583 0.3036 0.3036
2023-24 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.0816 0.0832 0.2345 0.2391
2024-25 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 42 13 10 23 0.548 0.0687 0.0656 0.1729 0.1650
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Mary ACHA_D1 39 12 15 27 0.692
2024-25 University of Mary ACHA_D1 39 12 15 27 0.692
2023-24 University of Mary ACHA_D1 39 12 15 27 0.692
2022-23 University of Mary ACHA_D1 39 12 15 27 0.692
2021-22 University of Mary ACHA_D1 39 12 15 27 0.692
2020-21 University of Mary ACHA_D1 39 12 15 27 0.692

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29934
Forward overall
#1771
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2004-05
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2009-10
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2022-23
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.