IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Beaton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Kemptville 73's CCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Kemptville 73's CCHL 46 1 6 7 0.152 0.0330 0.0377 0.1178 0.1346
2017-18 Kemptville 73's CCHL 60 7 14 21 0.350 0.0759 0.0828 0.2708 0.2954
2018-19 Kemptville 73's CCHL 56 13 34 47 0.839 0.1820 0.1905 0.6494 0.6796
2019-20 Youngstown Phantoms USHL 48 11 15 26 0.542 0.3195 0.3195 1.6269 1.6269
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 RPI D1 ECAC SR 34 6 13 19 0.559
2023-24 RPI D1 ECAC JR 32 4 8 12 0.375
2022-23 RPI D1 ECAC SO 31 2 6 8 0.258
2021-22 RPI D1 ECAC FR 41 4 9 13 0.317
2020-21 RPI D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20012
Forward overall
#911
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonah Alexander
Hobart · 2017-18
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey Schaefer
Nazareth · 2018-19
0.733 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cory Callen
Fitchburg State · 2006-07
1.071 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.