← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristen Bear Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-17 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Winnipeg Monarchs MJHL 6 0 1 1 0.167 0.0321 0.0321 0.1051 0.1051
2021-22 MJHL 45 6 9 15 0.333 0.0642 0.0669 0.2102 0.2189
2022-23 Winnipeg Monarchs MJHL 58 13 8 21 0.362 0.0697 0.0693 0.2283 0.2271
2023-24 El Paso Rhinos NAHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Cleary University ACHA_D1 4 0 1 1 0.250
2024-25 Cleary University ACHA_D1 4 0 1 1 0.250
2023-24 Cleary University ACHA_D1 4 0 1 1 0.250
2022-23 Cleary University ACHA_D1 4 0 1 1 0.250
2021-22 Cleary University ACHA_D1 4 0 1 1 0.250
2020-21 Cleary University ACHA_D1 4 0 1 1 0.250

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47936
Forward overall
#3178
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Framingham State · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.