IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Rollwagen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 46 6 17 23 0.500 0.2949 0.2949 1.4731 1.4731
2020-21 Fargo Force USHL 54 8 10 18 0.333 0.1966 0.1966 0.9820 0.9820
2021-22 Fargo Force USHL 58 15 14 29 0.500 0.2949 0.2643 1.4731 1.3204
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 36 7 5 12 0.333
2024-25 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 36 3 12 15 0.417
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 38 3 5 8 0.210
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC — 33 1 3 4 0.121
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2022-23 · Nebraska Omaha
-46.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18227
Forward overall
#834
Forward born in 2001
#1816
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trent Flory
Utica · 2000-01
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelly Wosnack
St. Norbert · 2001-02
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Yim
Adrian · 2014-15
1.138 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.