IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Jacobs Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-11-09 Country: USA
Bowdoin
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 58 15 24 39 0.672 0.2470 0.2519 0.7107 0.7247
2025-26 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 59 16 45 61 1.034 0.3799 0.3687 1.0927 1.0605
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11991
Forward overall
#563
Forward born in 2005
#390
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Sean Gaffney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.14 PPG
→ UConn (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Joseph-Matthew Manno
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gerald Mayhew
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG

Bowdoin Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Jayson Alegria
0.76
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
Colin MacCormack
0.84
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
Louie Marcellino
0.71
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin
Andy Nelson
0.71
actual FR PPG at Bowdoin

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Lewis
Finlandia · 2003-04
1.478 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Russell Anderson
Utica · 2007-08
1.059 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kris Heeres
SUNY Geneseo · 2001-02
1.042 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.