← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Faughnan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-24 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2023-24 Merritt Centennials BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 39 7 15 22 0.564 0.2073 0.2161 0.5962 0.6215
2025-26 — BCHL 37 8 11 19 0.513 0.1979 0.1956 0.7468 0.7381
2026-27 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 6 4 6 10 1.667 0.6422 0.6422 2.4240 2.4240
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
60%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27862
Forward overall
#1404
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.94 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.21 PPG
→ Northeastern (1.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.65 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.95 PPG
→ Union (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
0.53 Elite
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

AJHL 2020-21
0.38
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
BCHL 2014-15
0.62
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
1.310 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2006-07
1.769 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2014-15
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.