← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cooper Faughnan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-24 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
St. Lawrence
ECAC D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Boston Advantage NCDC 1 0 0 0 0.000
2023-24 Merritt Centennials BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 39 7 15 22 0.564 0.2073 0.2161 0.5954 0.6207
2025-26 BCHL 37 8 11 19 0.513 0.1979 0.1956 0.7473 0.7386
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27419
Forward overall
#1371
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

St. Lawrence Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

USHS-MN 2020-21
0.31
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
OJHL 2019-20
0.36
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
BCHL 2019-20
0.25
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence
USHL 2015-16
0.09
actual FR PPG at St. Lawrence

D2/3 Comparables

Westfield State · 2010-11
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2022-23
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.