← New Search ↗ Social Card

Camden Prier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-04-02 Country: USA
⚠️ Aging Out 2026-27: Turns 20 before Dec 31, 2026 — final eligible junior season.
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 44 9 15 24 0.545 0.2224 0.2417 0.4385 0.4765
2024-25 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 43 5 8 13 0.302 0.1111 0.1155 0.3191 0.3317
2025-26 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 21 5 10 15 0.714 0.2624 0.2598 0.7539 0.7465
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22050
Forward overall
#997
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Maine (0.54 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Average
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2012-13
0.44
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2015-16
0.10
actual FR PPG at Niagara
NAHL 2017-18
0.47
actual FR PPG at Niagara
OJHL 2014-15
0.29
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2011-12
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.