IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jake Boulanger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-18 Country: USA
Tufts
NESCAC D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Holderness NE-Prep 24 4 9 13 0.542 0.1073 0.1073 0.2468 0.2468
2022-23 Holderness NE-Prep 29 10 12 22 0.759 0.1503 0.1503 0.3456 0.3456
2023-24 Holderness NE-Prep 29 15 16 31 1.069 0.2118 0.2118 0.4870 0.4870
2024-25 — NAHL 50 5 5 10 0.200 0.0735 0.0747 0.2111 0.2146
2025-26 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 59 16 16 32 0.542 0.1993 0.1928 0.5725 0.5539
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29244
Forward overall
#1721
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG

Tufts Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Dennis Davidson
0.52
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Rory Andriole
0.37
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Lindsay Walker
0.67
actual FR PPG at Tufts
Tyler Voigt
0.96
actual FR PPG at Tufts

D2/3 Comparables

Jonathan Grebosky
Concordia · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cole Skelly
New England College · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Groth
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.