IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gleb Ushakov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-12-09 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Jersey Shore Whalers USPHL-Premier 13 2 5 7 0.538 0.0704 0.0783 0.1828 0.2033
2023-24 New York Apple Core EHL 45 19 38 57 1.267 0.2926 0.3048 0.6198 0.6456
2024-25 Oklahoma Warriors NAHL 56 2 6 8 0.143 0.0525 0.0511 0.1508 0.1469
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2025-26 · Buffalo State
+66.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
32%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#27286
Forward overall
#1577
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Williams
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy McGwin
Salem State · 2017-18
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Lecey
Nichols · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.