IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Steven Lecey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1991-11-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Cleveland Jr. Lumberjacks NA3HL 45 6 7 13 0.289 0.0348 0.0346 0.0913 0.0908
2011-12 Cleveland Jr. Lumberjacks NA3HL 48 11 24 35 0.729 0.0879 0.0827 0.2304 0.2168
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Nichols D3 CNE SR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2014-15 Nichols D3 CNE JR 25 3 4 7 0.280
2013-14 Nichols D3 CNE SO 23 0 5 5 0.217
2012-13 Nichols D3 CNE FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2012-13 · Nichols
+233.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17978
Defenseman overall
#1779
Defenseman born in 1991
#2290
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Garret Peterson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Army (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rex Moe
Adrian · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Morrissey
Colby · 2017-18
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Albergo
Saint Mary's · 2012-13
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.