IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jeremy Wilmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 45 12 21 33 0.733 0.5451 0.5451 2.7362 2.7362
2020-21 — NTDP-U18 39 11 26 37 0.949 0.7052 0.7052 3.5400 3.5400
2021-22 Tri-City Storm USHL 60 25 73 98 1.633 0.9635 0.9796 4.9055 4.9872
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 15 6 7 13 0.867
2024-25 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC — 38 15 26 41 1.079
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 38 6 30 36 0.947
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 37 9 23 32 0.865
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.97
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2022-23 · Boston University
-11.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 26 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
81%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
19%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2540
Forward overall
#47
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Cammarata
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.98 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Filimon Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.