← New Search ↗ Social Card

Luke Weilandt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 40 2 12 14 0.350 0.2151 0.2151 1.0312 1.0312
2020-21 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 3 1 1 2 0.667 0.4098 0.4098 1.9642 1.9642
2021-22 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 52 8 8 16 0.308 0.1891 0.1793 0.9065 0.8597
2022-23 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 48 19 24 43 0.896 0.3337 0.3065 1.3053 1.1990
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast GR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast SR 35 1 5 6 0.171
2023-24 Merrimack D1 HockeyEast JR 23 3 2 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Merrimack
-0.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19830
Forward overall
#1078
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Fredonia · 2008-09
0.842 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamilton · 2012-13
1.091 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2016-17
1.207 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.