IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Maruna Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-08-07 Country: USA
Norwich
LittleEast D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 — AJHL 36 6 8 14 0.389 0.1304 0.1284 0.3599 0.3544
2025-26 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 41 14 22 36 0.878 0.3226 0.3089 0.9267 0.8874
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20131
Forward overall
#1089
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
A.J. Reid
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.18 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Norwich Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Scott Schroeder
0.74
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Chris Duszynski
0.73
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Steve Schroeder
0.74
actual FR PPG at Norwich
Bryan O'Mara
0.57
actual FR PPG at Norwich

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Birmingham
Connecticut College · 2011-12
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andy Willock
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2005-06
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Alexei Filimonov
Fitchburg State · 2024-25
1.560 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.