IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinlan Clair Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-11-04 Country: Canada
Niagara
AHA D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2024-25 Cowichan Valley Capitals BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2025-26 — OJHL 51 5 21 26 0.510 0.1250 0.1293 0.3509 0.3629
2026-27 Milton Menace OJHL 12 1 9 10 0.833 0.2042 0.2026 0.5736 0.5692
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
22%
Age-Out / Club
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6411
Defenseman overall
#918
Defenseman born in 2007

D1 Comparables

Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Nelson Armstrong
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dakota Mermis
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Denver (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

Niagara Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

Zac Herrmann
NAHL 2016-17
0.23
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Jonny Hill
CCHL 2017-18
0.07
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Ethan Lund
USHS-MN 2020-21
0.00
actual FR PPG at Niagara
Chris Harpur
BCHL 2015-16
0.22
actual FR PPG at Niagara

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Stattner
Marian · 2002-03
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Artur Terchiyev
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Gallagher
Marian · 2002-03
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.