← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Murray Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-03-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 WB/Scranton Knights NCDC 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.1019 0.1111 0.2009 0.2190
2023-24 NCDC 23 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Wisconsin Woodsmen NA3HL 40 7 18 25 0.625 0.0784 0.0763
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 1 3 4 0.182
2024-25 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 1 3 4 0.182
2023-24 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 1 3 4 0.182
2022-23 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 1 3 4 0.182
2021-22 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 1 3 4 0.182
2020-21 University of Colorado ACHA_D1 22 1 3 4 0.182

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20893
Defenseman overall
#3560
Defenseman born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2008-09
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2003-04
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.