← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caden Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-22 Country: USA
Lindenwood
Ind. D1

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 40 7 13 20 0.500 0.3877 0.3877 1.8610 1.8610
2020-21 NTDP-U18 34 5 12 17 0.500 0.3877 0.3877 1.8610 1.8610
2022-23 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 35 7 20 27 0.771 0.4742 0.4539 2.2727 2.1753
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ferris State D1 CCHA 31 5 9 14 0.452
2024-25 Ohio State D1 BigTen 3 1 1 2 0.667
2023-24 Ohio State D1 BigTen 24 4 6 10 0.417
2022-23 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 13 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 33 2 4 6 0.182

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

82%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
8%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11691
Forward overall
#527
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.74 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ RPI (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Miami (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

Lindenwood Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

NAHL 2020-21
0.58
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
QMJHL 2023-24
0.70
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
USHS-MN 2019-20
0.20
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood
NE-Prep 2022-23
0.89
actual FR PPG at Lindenwood

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Boston · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
1.704 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2008-09
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.